Admin, I support your messages. but let us maintain decorum not to abuse moulana saad even he leaned towards evil intentions. wallahu ‘alam. you can mention the true happenings. but not demeaning moulana saad as personality.. we must look only the collective level and individual , allah will take care of him. May Allah guide him and make him realize his mistakes so that jamath runs under unanimity.aameen.

i disagree.. not to publish these matters in media. our period is different and we live in world of information technology. i myself perplexed to know why there is dispute at executive level. while I respect and involve to tabligh activities, knowing the disputes every people must know. this is not to cause fitna but to understand what is happening really. since you are posting things with solid evidences, I advice you to maintain decorum in your writing. let us pray for moulana saad so that he correct his mistakes and adhere to what agree in mashwara. regards to muntahab ahadith,i consider the book can be adopted as second book and not as replacement to fadhaile amal book. also, moulana saad can be open mentioning the book as extended work of author moulana yusuf, translated by 6 ulamahs (mentioning their names) verified and inspected by moulana saad. he can be honest and adopt this book by presenting this in mashwara. surely mashwara will adopt. Allah will open ways for it. definitely we need second book as we are living in a period of so much information and hoenestly there are sufi stories mentioned by moulana zakaria which are not meant to be correct but added as a part of anecdotes considering the mindset of the people living that time. but our period is different. while we benefit spirutually from fadhaile amal, we also must have second book. there is nothing wrong in that. it is my personal opinion.

Please read about the Adaab of Ikhtilaaf

We have always shared our contact details. Brothers have contacted us through WhatsApp. Please email us at admin@tablighi-jamaat.com

Seriously!! What is the issue with “unanimity”?
Where does this belong to democratic principles?
What is “Ijma” in Shari’ah then?

Let me get this straight… according to you.. all Darul Uloom (https://tablighi-jamaat.com/en/fatwas/) and all elders (https://tablighi-jamaat.com/en/elders-statement-on-maulana-saad/)…. all of them are wrong and only Maulana Saad is right?