Dont talk about the deen using logic!!!.. If logic had been used in deen. Then why would we do masah over our leather socks instead of under it? Have you ever thought that maybe maulana saad saheb even although he didnt go on jamaat but he is still learnt is still and well worthy and maybe most worthy to be the ameer. And Allah wanted him to be the ameer? And all shurah and elders going against someone Allah made preparation to be ameer would cause serious detrimental problems for everyone even worse of a split maybe the effort is split today but the effort exists. Did maulana ilyas have to go on tabligh or maulana yusuf had to go on tabligh to be ameer? They were the pioneers the mujaddids. You people should all read maulana yusuf sahebs biography even maulana yusuf saheb used to sit quietly embarrassed and ignoring maulana ilyas’s idea of tablighi jamaat. With the help of hazrat shaykh and some guidance from Allah maulana yusuf became the one who spread it all over the world. It is said clearly in his biography “Allah ta ala does not let a special wali persons “Nisbat” go to waste so it is said after the death of m.ilyas, m.yusuf was ever more like maulana ilyas and it was evident. Tablighi principle is there but like the balancing of good and bad the bad is and fitnahs is quickly spreading hence why hazrat saad saheb seems like he is exagurating in his talks hence the refutes. If it wasnt for tablighi jamaat millions wont be guided and it wouldnt of been because of darul uloom deoband. Nowadays alims are modern and forget some aspects of deen. Need to fight iblees with power thats as much or more to be able to balance and in that fight Allah is giving maulana saad saheb plenty of tawfeeq by finding key aspects of the Quran and Sunnah to back up his talks. Especially laying the emphasis on the Sunnah as we all already know that Allah promised to preserve the Quran.

Look at the status of the Tablighi efforts and the division of the ummath. The elders were disillusioned by certain munafiqèen. They are answerable to Allah. The divide caused by these elders is more sinful than the deestablishment of so called Haq that you are concerned with.

Look at who noticed his errors and tried to rectify him, they are not ordinary people but learned scholars of Deen and elders of the effort, don’t be blind to the haq brother… You don’t continue following someone when he has erred and doesn’t make any effort to return to the haq…

Brother, itha’ath to one Ameer is the fundamental doctrine in Dheen. As long as the Ameer sticks to fundamentals of Tabliqrue, 6 numbers, Ijthimayi, huruj we should obey him without any reservation.
If we do not like the Ameer personally, we should cry to Allah to change him, not to rebel against him and divide the ummath.

Alhamdulilah. One Ameer inshaAllah

This letter signed suspicious. None of this story make sense. This is not correct.

Yip according to the way of Saad… Not according to the way during times of pious elders